<

shiny objects

Wednesday, November 30, 2005


OOOOooohhh. I get it now. It WASN'T the sexual content of my blog that made a few individuals flame my comments feature. Sorry, dudes. You'll have to forgive me. When I do receive hate mail of that vein, it's usually because some Bible-smacking fundimentalist has leapt across my blog and had a fit over the word "hooter." You didn't specify your grievance, so you'll have to forgive me for misinterpreting.

So the problem is the Angelman's syndrome post? Well, I'll have you know that all the quotes from normal siblings came from this site right here. I only added emphasis and maybe cut one or two sentences for conservation of space (which isn't a great quoting practice, but hey, we like it fast and dirty here). And I'm sure many bitches (like myself) would agree that it's pretty amusing to read, in a schadenfreude sort of way.

It's not a hate post. I didn't say they should be gassed or anything. It's a joyful celebration of human malfunction. Haha. Your kids probably can't read anyway, am I right?

You people say I'm uncivilized, but haven't you ever heard of sending an email? I can remove posts that really hurt someone's feelings. Well, if I feel like it. It's a little more effective, however, to send me an angry email than to leave whiney posts in my comments.

Anyhow, gentle readers, the Angelman's post is gone. If you want to read it again, you'll have to peep at the copy burned into Leslie Thacker's retinas.


|